Why the study?
Long-term success of CABG largely depends on treatment adherence and self-care, and this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the 5A self-management model on these outcomes.
Does a 5A self-management model improve treatment adherence and self-care in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery?
Does a 5A self-management model improve treatment adherence and self-care in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery?
5A model improves post-CABG adherence and self-care; extends structured education evidence in cardiac surgical populations.
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most effective treatments for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, its long-term success largely depends on patients' adherence to treatment and engagement in self-care behaviors. Patient-centered self-management programs can enhance health behaviors and improve these outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the 5A self-management model on treatment adherence and self-care among patients undergoing CABG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: = 30) groups. The intervention group will receive a self-management program based on the 5A model, which includes the stages of assess, advise, agree, assist, and arrange. The control group will receive routine care. Data will be collected at three stages before, immediately, and 2 months after the intervention using the Modanloo treatment adherence questionnaire and self-care questionnaire for patients undergoing CABG. Data analysis will be performed with SPSS version 26, using descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, independent and paired t-tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA. DISCUSSION: This study will examine the effect of the 5A self-management model on treatment adherence and self-care in CABG patients. The main strength of the study lies in its use of an evidence-based framework. However, its short-term follow-up, single-center design, and reliance on self-reported data represent key limitations. Findings may contribute to the development of policies aimed at improving cardiac patient care, strengthening self-management programs within healthcare systems, and providing an evidence-based framework for designing similar interventions in other patient populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tajizadegan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: