Why the study?
Does switching to cilnidipine improve albuminuria and heart rate in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes previously treated with other calcium channel blockers?
Does switching to cilnidipine improve albuminuria and heart rate in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes previously treated with other calcium channel blockers?
Switching from other calcium channel blockers to the L/N-type calcium channel blocker cilnidipine reduces heart rate and albuminuria in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting a sympathetically-mediated renoprotective effect.
Switching to cilnidipine was associated with lower heart rate and ACR; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
This study was designed to investigate whether the L/N-type calcium channel blocker, cilnidipine, had a renoprotective effect compared with other calcium channel blockers. Twenty-five hypertensive patients with concomitant type 2 diabetes who had a urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) of 10 - 300 mg albumin/g creatinine and who had been treated with oral calcium channel blockers other than cilnidipine for more than 3 months were included. Patients' medication was changed to cilnidipine 10 mg/day or 20 mg/day without a washout period. Blood pressure and renal function were measured before and at 3 months after the new treatment. Heart rate was also determined as a marker for sympathetic nervous activity. After substitution of cilnidipine, blood pressure did not change significantly, but heart rate decreased significantly from 73.9 +/- 7.1 beats/min to 72.0 +/- 8.4 beats/min, and the log-transformed urinary ACR decreased to 82.9 +/- 49.4% of baseline values. The changes in urinary ACR and heart rate showed a significant positive correlation. Thus, there was a strong indication that cilnidipine may exert its renoprotective effect by inhibiting sympathetic nervous activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masami Tanaka (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: