Why the study?
Does leaving the sheath guide wire in place during transvenous electrode placement allow for multiple lead insertions without additional subclavian punctures?
Does leaving the sheath guide wire in place during transvenous electrode placement allow for multiple lead insertions without additional subclavian punctures?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Leaving the guide wire in place during transvenous lead insertion provides a simple and effective method for multiple lead placements, avoiding additional subclavian punctures.
An adaptation of the sheath set approach for permanent transvenous electrode placement has been carried out in fifteen patients. At the time of lead insertion, the sheath guide wire is left in place. If a second lead is desired or lead exchange becomes necessary, a second sheath is applied to the retained guide wire and a new lead inserted, thus avoiding a second subclavian puncture or new venous cutdown. This in effect offers a limitless access to the central venous system as long as the guide wire is left in place. This adaptation is especially suited for dual chamber pacing, where multiple leads may be required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter H. Belott (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: