Why the study?
Does the sampling interval affect the detection of the VO2 plateau during a VO2max test?
Does the sampling interval affect the detection of the VO2 plateau during a VO2max test?
Shorter sampling intervals (11 breath) are more suitable for detecting the VO2 plateau during incremental exercise testing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shorter sampling intervals increase VO2 plateau detection; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change exercise testing protocols.
The purpose of this study was to elucidate incidence of <TEX>VO₂</TEX> plateau by comparing data derived from different time averaging intervals during incremental cycling exercise to <TEX>VO₂max</TEX>. Seventeen subjects (age: <TEX>23.5±3.3</TEX> years and <TEX>VO₂max</TEX>: <TEX>3.65±0.73</TEX> L/min, respectively) completed <TEX>VO₂max</TEX> tests on cycle ergometer which breath by breath gas ex-change data were obtained. These data were time-averaged into 11-breath, 15, 30 and 60 s sampling intervals. The incidence of plateau were 100, 35, 24 and 6% for the 11 breath, 15 s, 30 s and 60 s averaging, respectively. No correlation was between <TEX>Δ</TEX> <TEX>$VO-2$</TEX> at <TEX>VO₂max</TEX> and <TEX>VO₂max</TEX> (r=0.008). 53% (maximal HR within 10 b/min) and 100% <TEX>(RER≥1.15)</TEX> of subjects met the criteria for attainment of <TEX>VO₂max</TEX>. This data indicate that shorter sampling intervals (11 breath) is the most suitable for de-tection of the <TEX>VO₂</TEX> plateau and RER can be used for the criteria for attainment of <TEX>VO₂max</TEX> but not maximal HR. Also, the incidence of a plateau is not related to training status or physical fitness of subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoon et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: