Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Debate about urban sustainability is in some danger of splitting into narrow, technical disagreements in which value-laden questions about the purposes, meanings and lived reality of cities are easily lost. As one way of anchoring debate about urban futures in foundational questions, this article focuses on the history of suburban ambivalence towards modern development that has helped shape Australian cities. This history offers important insights into contemporary suburban aspirations and environmentalist critique of them. It is presented here as a contribution to efforts to constitute urban sustainability as viable democratic projects built on more than expert discourses of efficiency and risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aidan Davison (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: