Key result
Hypertensive rat carotid arteries show mechanical strength equivalent to normotensive controls.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have previously reported an adaptation of arterial wall elasticity in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) that involves an increase in both fibronectin/alpha5beta1-integrin complexes and smooth-muscle elastic lamellae connections. We examined the mechanical strength (MS) of the carotid artery in relation to its elastic properties, its elastin/collagen content, and the structure of the internal elastic lamina. MS was defined as the in vitro intraluminal pressure and wall stress that produces rupture of the vascular wall. Intact carotid arteries from 3-month-old normotensive rats (Wistar-Kyoto, WKY) and SHR were cannulated on a specially designed device and adjusted to their in situ length. A slowly increasing static pressure was applied until wall rupture occurred to determine the static mechanical behavior and MS. Static elasticity was similar in SHR and WKY, as were the rupture pressure (2740+/-90 versus 2740+/-40 mm Hg) and wall stress at rupture (11.5+/-1.0 versus 12.8+/-0.4 MPa), indicating equivalent MS in both groups. Histological examination showed several wall ruptures and dissociation of lamellar units that did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Confocal microscopy showed that the size of fenestrations of the internal elastic lamina and the fraction of area occupied by them were reduced 3-fold in SHR. We have demonstrated that static elasticity of the arterial wall and mechanical strength are similar in carotid arteries from SHR and WKY.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cohuet et al. (2001) studied Spontaneous hypertension (in rats). Spontaneous hypertension (SHR) vs. Normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats was evaluated on Mechanical strength (in vitro intraluminal pressure and wall stress at vascular wall rupture). Carotid arteries from spontaneously hypertensive rats showed equivalent mechanical strength to normotensive controls (rupture pressure 2740±90 vs 2740±40 mm Hg; wall stress 11.5±1.0 vs 12.8±0.4 MPa).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: