Imaging system performance can be described in the spatial domain, where the optical blur diameter is compared to the detector size, or in the frequency domain [modular transfer function (MTF) approach], where the optics cutoff is compared to the detector cutoff. Both comparisons provide a metric that is a function of F/d, where F is the focal ratio, is the wavelength, and d is the detector size. F/d is applied to three models: Schade's equivalent resolution (visible systems), Snyder's MTFA (MTF area; visible systems), and target acquisition (NVThermIP—an infrared system model). All models produced curves that exhibit a transition in the region 0.41<F/d<1.0, representing a change from detector-limited to optics-limited performance. NVThermIP's contrast equations are simplified to easily calculate resolution and acquisition range. Trade-off analyses include range versus detector size, versus focal ratio, and versus field of view (FOV). When F/d>2, no aliasing occurs. This may be important for medical imaging, where sampling artifacts may be interpreted as a medical abnormality, or for space probes, where it is impossible to obtain ground truth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerald C. Holst (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: