Why the study?
Does chronic amiodarone therapy cause superior sinoatrial node dysfunction in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does chronic amiodarone therapy cause superior sinoatrial node dysfunction in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Chronic amiodarone therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with superior sinoatrial node dysfunction, characterized by a downward shift of the earliest activation site and unresponsiveness to sympathetic stimulation.
Amiodarone use was associated with superior SAN dysfunction in AF; hypothesis-generating and leaves open causality or practice implications.
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying amiodarone-induced sinoatrial node (SAN) dysfunction remain unclear, so we used 3-dimensional endocardial mapping of the right atrium (RA) to investigate. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a matched-cohort design, 18 patients taking amiodarone before atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation (amiodarone group) were matched for age, sex and type of AF with 18 patients who had undergone AF ablation without taking amiodarone (no-amiodarone group). The amiodarone group had a slower heart rate than the no-amiodarone group at baseline and during isoproterenol infusion. Only the amiodarone group had sick sinus syndrome (n=4, 22%, P=0.03) and abnormal (>550ms) corrected SAN recovery time (n=5, 29%; P=0.02). The median distance from the junction of the superior vena cava (SVC) and RA to the most cranial earliest activation site (EAS) was longer in the amiodarone group than in the no-amiodarone group at baseline (20.5 vs. 10.6mm, P=0.04) and during isoproterenol infusion (12.8 vs. 6.3mm, P=0.03). The distance from the SVC-RA junction to the EAS negatively correlated with the P-wave amplitudes of leads II (r=-0.47), III (r=-0.60) and aVF (r=-0.56) (P<0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In a quarter of the AF patients, amiodarone causes superior SAN dysfunction, which results in a downward shift of the EAS and reduced P-wave amplitude in leads II, III and aVF at baseline and during isoproterenol infusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mun et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: