Why the study?
Does native splenic T1-mapping predict the splenic switch-off sign during adenosine stress CMR in patients and healthy controls?
Does native splenic T1-mapping predict the splenic switch-off sign during adenosine stress CMR in patients and healthy controls?
Splenic T1-mapping during adenosine stress is a novel, gadolinium-free method that accurately predicts the 'splenic switch-off' sign, allowing for optimization of stress adequacy before first-pass perfusion imaging.
Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed with inadequate adenosine stress leads to false-negative results and suboptimal clinical management. The recently proposed marker of adequate stress, the “splenic switch-off” sign, detects splenic blood flow attenuation during stress perfusion (spleen appears dark), but can only be assessed after gadolinium first-pass, when it is too late to optimize the stress response. Reduction in splenic blood volume during adenosine stress is expected to shorten native splenic T1, which may predict splenic switch-off without the need for gadolinium. Two-hundred and twelve subjects underwent adenosine stress CMR: 1.5 T ( n = 104; 75 patients, 29 healthy controls); 3 T ( n = 108; 86 patients, 22 healthy controls). Native T1 spleen was assessed using heart-rate-independent ShMOLLI prototype sequence at rest and during adenosine stress (140 μg/kg/min, 4 min, IV) in 3 short-axis slices (basal, mid-ventricular, apical). This was compared with changes in peak splenic perfusion signal intensity (ΔSI spleen ) and the “splenic switch-off” sign on conventional stress/rest gadolinium perfusion imaging. T1 spleen values were obtained blinded to perfusion ΔSI spleen , both were derived using regions of interest carefully placed to avoid artefacts and partial-volume effects. Normal resting splenic T1 values were 1102 ± 66 ms (1.5 T) and 1352 ± 114 ms (3 T), slightly higher than in patients (1083 ± 59 ms, p = 0.04; 1295 ± 105 ms, p = 0.01, respectively). T1 spleen decreased significantly during adenosine stress (mean ΔT1 spleen ~ −40 ms), independent of field strength, age, gender, and cardiovascular diseases. While ΔT1 spleen correlated strongly with ΔSI spleen (rho = 0.70, p < 0.0001); neither indices showed significant correlations with conventional hemodynamic markers (rate pressure product) during stress. By ROC analysis, a ΔT1 spleen threshold of ≥ −30 ms during stress predicted the “splenic switch-off” sign (AUC 0.90, p < 0.0001) with sensitivity (90%), specificity (88%), accuracy (90%), PPV (98%), NPV (42%). Adenosine stress and rest splenic T1-mapping is a novel method for assessing stress responses, independent of conventional hemodynamic parameters. It enables prediction of the visual “splenic switch-off” sign without the need for gadolinium, and correlates well to changes in splenic signal intensity during stress/rest perfusion imaging. ΔT1 spleen holds promise to facilitate optimization of stress responses before gadolinium first-pass perfusion CMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: