Key result
False-negative adenosine stress perfusion CMR scans showed a lack of splenic switch-off in 20.7% of cases compared to 13.1% in true-positive scans (P = 0.37).
Why the study?
Does the lack of splenic switch-off (SSO) identify false-negative adenosine stress perfusion CMR scans?
Observational (n=23,065)
Does the lack of splenic switch-off (SSO) identify false-negative adenosine stress perfusion CMR scans?
Lack of splenic switch-off is prevalent and measurable, offering potential as a marker of adenosine understress in CMR perfusion scans despite non-significant differences between false-negative and true-positive groups in this study.
Splenic switch-off does not explain false-negative adenosine stress CMR; leaves open alternative causes and requires prospective validation.
AIMS: Adenosine can induce splenic vasoconstriction (splenic switch-off, SSO). In this study, we aim to evaluate the utility of identifying a lack of SSO for detecting false-negative adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scans. METHODS AND RESULTS: We visually analysed 492 adenosine stress perfusion CMR scans reported as negative in a cohort of patients with no previous history of coronary artery disease. A lack of SSO was identified in 11%. We quantified the phenomenon by drawing regions of interest on the spleen and comparing intensity between stress and rest scans, the spleen intensity ratio (SIR). Inter-rater agreement for qualitative determination of SSO was κ = 0.81 and inter-class correlation for quantitative determination of SSO was 0.94. The optimal threshold for SIR as an indicator of SSO was 0.40 (sensitivity = 82.5%, specificity = 92.3%, AUC = 0.91). 23 065 CMR scans and 9926 invasive coronary angiogram reports were retrospectively examined to identify patients with negative CMR scans who required coronary intervention in the subsequent 12 months (false negatives). We compared these scans with true positives who had positive adenosine stress perfusion CMR scans followed by coronary intervention. The rate of lack of SSO was 20.7% in the false-negative group versus 13.1% in true positives (P = 0.37). CONCLUSION: The lack of SSO is prevalent, easily measureable, and has potential to improve on haemodynamic criteria as a marker of adenosine understress in CMR perfusion scans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosking et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=23,065). False-negative adenosine stress perfusion CMR scans vs. True-positive adenosine stress perfusion CMR scans was evaluated on Rate of lack of splenic switch-off (SSO) (p=0.37). False-negative adenosine stress perfusion CMR scans showed a lack of splenic switch-off in 20.7% of cases compared to 13.1% in true-positive scans (P = 0.37).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: