Why the study?
LV geometry is closely associated with cardiovascular disease, but few studies have evaluated the relationship between basal septal hypertrophy and LV geometry.
Does basal septal hypertrophy associate with altered left ventricular geometry in a community population?
Does basal septal hypertrophy associate with altered left ventricular geometry in a community population?
Basal septal hypertrophy is independently associated with increased relative wall thickness and concentric remodeling in a community population, suggesting it may be an early marker of adverse left ventricular geometric changes.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) geometry is closely associated with cardiovascular disease; however, few studies have evaluated the relationship between basal septal hypertrophy (BSH) and LV geometry. In this study, we examined the relationship between BSH and LV geometry in a Beijing community population. METHODS: The clinical and echocardiographic data of 1032 participants from a community in Beijing were analyzed. BSH was defined as a basal interventricular septal thickness ≥ 14 mm and a basal septal thickness/mid-septal thickness ≥ 1.3. On the basis of their echocardiographic characteristics, patients were described as having a normal geometry, concentric remodeling, concentric hypertrophy, or eccentric hypertrophy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between BSH, LV mass index (LVMI), and relative wall thickness (RWT). RESULTS: The prevalence of BSH was 7.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-9.0%). Basal and middle interventricular septal thickness, LV posterior wall thickness, and RWT were greater, while LVMI and LV end-diastolic dimension were lower in the BSH group than in the non-BSH group (p < 0.05). The BSH group accounted for the highest proportion of patients with concentric remodeling. A multivariable regression analysis showed that BSH increased by 3.99-times (odds ratio [OR] 3.99, 95% CI 2.05-7.78, p < 0.01) when RWT was > 0.42, but not when LVMI increased (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02-1.19, p = 0.07). There were no interactions between BSH and age, body mass index, sex, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, stroke, and smoking in relation to an RWT > 0.42. CONCLUSION: BSH was independently associated with an RWT > 0.42.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: