Why the study?
The relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and endothelial function in women required evaluation.
Is there an independent association between HDL-C levels and endothelial function in women?
Is there an independent association between HDL-C levels and endothelial function in women?
The apparent relationship between higher HDL-C levels and improved endothelial function in women is likely confounded by traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
HDL-C linked to better FMD in women; leaves open whether raising levels improves endothelial function prospectively.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and endothelial function in women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: 22 university hospitals and affiliated clinics in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: 1719 Japanese women aged 17-90 years who were not receiving lipid-lowering therapy. MEASURES: We evaluated flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and serum levels of HDL-C. All participants were divided into four groups by HDL-C level: low HDL-C (<40 mg/dL), moderate HDL-C (40-59 mg/dL), high HDL-C (60-79 md/dL) and extremely high HDL-C (≥80 mg/dL). RESULTS: Univariate regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between FMD and HDL-C (r=0.12, p<0.001). FMD values were significantly smaller in the low HDL-C group (5.2%±3.8%) and moderate HDL-C group (5.2%±3.8%) than in the extremely high HDL-C group (6.7%±3.4%) (p=0.024 and p=0.003, respectively), while there was no significant difference in FMD between the high HDL-C group and the extremely high HDL-C group. Multiple logistic regression analysis did not show a significant association between HDL-C levels and FMD. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial function increased in relation to HDL-C levels. However, there was no association of HDL-C levels with endothelial function after adjustment of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in women. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000012950; Results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takaeko et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: