Why the study?
Does ticagrelor improve microvascular function compared to prasugrel in patients with revascularized STEMI?
Does ticagrelor improve microvascular function compared to prasugrel in patients with revascularized STEMI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The REDUCE-MVI study is a randomized trial designed to evaluate whether ticagrelor improves microvascular function compared to prasugrel in patients with revascularized STEMI.
Microvascular injury is present in a large proportion of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) despite successful revascularization. Ticagrelor potentially mitigates this process by exerting additional adenosine-mediated effects. This study aims to determine whether ticagrelor is associated with a better microvascular function compared to prasugrel as maintenance therapy after STEMI. A total of 110 patients presenting with STEMI and additional intermediate stenosis in another coronary artery will be studied after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the infarct-related artery. Patients will be randomized to treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel for 1 year. FFR-guided PCI of the non-infarct-related artery will be performed at 1 month. Microvascular function will be assessed by measurement of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in the infarct-related artery and non-infarct-related artery, immediately after primary PCI and after 1 month. The REDUCE-MVI study will establish whether ticagrelor as a maintenance therapy may improve microvascular function in patients after revascularized STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janssens et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: