Key result
Ticagrelor pretreatment increases post-PCI coronary blood flow ~18% vs prasugrel and improves microvascular resistance.
Why the study?
Ticagrelor has additional properties potentially affecting coronary microcirculation compared with prasugrel in patients with stable CAD undergoing elective PCI.
Does ticagrelor improve coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance compared to prasugrel in patients with stable CAD undergoing elective PCI?
RCT (n=50)
randomly assigned
Does ticagrelor improve coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance compared to prasugrel in patients with stable CAD undergoing elective PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 242% vs 205%
p-value: p=0.015
Pretreatment with a loading dose of ticagrelor compared with prasugrel improves post-procedural coronary flow and microvascular function, and reduces periprocedural myocardial injury in stable CAD patients undergoing elective PCI.
May support microvascular benefit of ticagrelor pretreatment; leaves open clinical outcome impact.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of ticagrelor and prasugrel on absolute coronary blood flow (Q) and microvascular resistance (R) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (NCT05643586). Besides being at least as effective as prasugrel in inhibiting platelet aggregation, ticagrelor has been shown to have additional properties potentially affecting coronary microcirculation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 50 patients to ticagrelor (180 mg) or prasugrel (60 mg) at least 12 hours before intervention. Continuous thermodilution was used to measure Q and R before and after PCI. Platelet reactivity was measured before PCI. Troponin I was measured before, 8 and 24 hours after PCI. RESULTS: At baseline, fractional flow reserve, Q and R were similar in two study groups. Patients in the ticagrelor group showed higher post-PCI Q (242±49 vs 205±53 mL/min, p=0.015) and lower R values (311 (263, 366) vs 362 (319, 382) mm Hg/L/min, p=0.032). Platelet reactivity showed a negative correlation with periprocedural variation of Q values (r=-0.582, p<0.001) and a positive correlation with periprocedural variation of R values (r=0.645, p<0.001). The periprocedural increase in high-sensitivity troponin I was significantly lower in the ticagrelor compared with the prasugrel group (5 (4, 9) ng/mL vs 14 (10, 24) ng/mL, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI, pretreatment with a loading dose of ticagrelor compared with prasugrel improves post-procedural coronary flow and microvascular function and seems to reduce the related myocardial injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangiacapra et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=50). Ticagrelor vs. Prasugrel (60 mg) was evaluated on Post-PCI absolute coronary blood flow (Q) [mL/min] (p=0.015). Pretreatment with ticagrelor compared with prasugrel improved post-PCI absolute coronary blood flow (242 vs 205 mL/min, p=0.015) and microvascular resistance (p=0.032).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: