Why the study?
Does streamline visualization with 4DFlow MRI improve the quantification of left ventricular inflow compared to static 2D-MPR in healthy controls and patients after AVSD correction?
Does streamline visualization with 4DFlow MRI improve the quantification of left ventricular inflow compared to static 2D-MPR in healthy controls and patients after AVSD correction?
Streamline visualization using 4DFlow MRI optimizes measurement plane positioning, significantly improving the accuracy of left ventricular inflow quantification in patients after AVSD correction.
PIV-level tracking may improve post-AVSD LV inflow accuracy with 4D-MPR; leaves open prospective validation versus 2D-MPR.
PURPOSE: To evaluate trans-left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) blood flow and optimize left ventricular inflow quantification in healthy controls and patients after atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) correction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients after AVSD correction and 25 controls underwent 4DFlow MRI. Using streamline visualization in four- and two-chamber views, inflow direction at early and late filling was defined at the annulus level and at the peak inflow velocity (PIV) level. Trans-LAVV flow volume and velocity were assessed from a static 2D-multiplanar-reformat (MPR), a 4D-MPR tracking LAVV annulus and a 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, angulated perpendicular to the inflow. RESULTS: In patients, on average 9° more laterally directed inflow was found at the PIV-level compared to controls. In controls, 4DFlow velocity mapping with LAVV annulus tracking resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (3 (1-8) mL) than with static 2D-MPR (7 (4-16) mL, P = 0.001). In patients, 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (2 (1-4) mL) than with 4D-MPR LAVV annulus tracking (6 (2-10) mL, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Streamline visualization of 4DFlow MRI data revealed dynamic trans-LAVV inflow and more lateral flow after AVSD correction. Streamline visualization improved trans-LAVV flow quantification as the positioning and angulation of the measurement plane was optimized, allowing an accurate assessment of left ventricular inflow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calkoen et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: