Why the study?
It remained unclear whether clinical signs of FH and pathogenic FH-variants are associated with CAD events beyond LDL cholesterol levels in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia.
Do clinical and genetic signatures of familial hypercholesterolemia increase the risk of CAD events in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia?
Do clinical and genetic signatures of familial hypercholesterolemia increase the risk of CAD events in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia?
Clinical and genetic signatures of familial hypercholesterolemia strongly predict coronary artery disease events in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia, independent of cumulative LDL cholesterol exposure.
Supports combined clinical-genetic FH assessment for CAD risk stratification in severe hypercholesterolemia; extends evidence but leaves therapeutic implications open.
BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is diagnosed based on clinical signs of FH, including family history and/or xanthomas, or pathogenic FH-variant. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to clarify whether these signatures are associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) events beyond low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level among patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with severe hypercholesterolemia (LDL cholesterol ≥180 mg/dL) aged ≥15 years (N = 1,273; male, n = 631) admitted to Kanazawa University Hospital between 2000 and 2022. We divided the patients into 4 groups based on clinical signs of FH and/or presence of FH-variant and assessed the factors associated with CAD events using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: We identified 144 CAD events during the 12.4-year median follow-up. Baseline LDL cholesterol level in patients with any signs of FH tended to be significantly higher than non-FH patients. Compared with the reference group of patients without any signs of FH, patients with FH-variant or clinical signs of FH had significantly higher HRs of developing CAD events (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.02-1.86; P = 0.007 and HR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.41-3.13; P < 0.001, respectively), whereas those with clinical signs of FH and FH-variant had more than 5-fold higher HR for CAD (HR: 5.02; 95% CI: 2.60-7.44; P < 0.001) after adjusting for known risk factors, including LDL cholesterol year score. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe hypercholesterolemia, clinical and genetic signatures of FH are useful for risk discrimination for CAD beyond their hypercholesterolemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tada et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: