Why the study?
The study examined whether World Championship and Olympic medallist endurance athletes pace similarly to race opponents, where and when critical pacing differences occur, and tactical strategies used.
Analysis of elite endurance athletes reveals distinct pacing strategies between distances and sexes, with men typically separating from the pack later in races than women.
Medallists' distinct separation points inform championship race tactics; leaves open generalization to training or non-elite athletes.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether World Championship and Olympic medallist endurance athletes pace similarly to their race opponents, where and when critical differences in intra-race pacing occur, and the tactical strategies employed to optimally manage energy resources. We analyzed pacing and tactics across the 800 m, 1500 m, 5000 m, 10,000 m, marathon and racewalk events, providing a broad overview for optimal preparation for racing and pacing. Official electronic splits from men’s (n=275 performances) and women’s (n=232 performances) distance races between 2013 and 2017 were analyzed. Athletes were grouped for the purposes of analysis and comparison. For the 800 m, these groups were the medalists and those finishing 4th to 8th (“Top 8”). For the 1500 m, the medalists and Top 8 were joined by those finishing 9th to 12th (“Top 12”), whereas for all other races, the Top 15 were analyzed (those finishing 9th to 15th). One-way repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted on the segment speeds (p < 0.05), with effect sizes for differences calculated using Cohen’s d. Positive pacing profiles were common to most 800 m athletes, whereas negative pacing was more common over longer distances. In the 1500 m, male medalists separated from their rivals in the last 100 m, whereas for women it was after 1200 m. Similarly, over 5000 m, male medalists separated from the slowest pack members later (4200 m; 84% of duration) than women (2500 m; 50% of duration). In the 10,000m race, the effect was very pronounced with men packing until 8000 m, with the Top 8 athletes only dropped at 9600 m (96% of duration). For women, the slowest pack begin to run slower at only 1700 m, with the Top 8 finishers dropped at 5300 m (53% of duration). Such profiles and patterns were seen across all events. It is possible the earlier separation in pacing for women between the medalists and the other runners was because of tactical racing factors such as an early realization of being unable to sustain the required speed, or perhaps because of greater variation in performance abilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hettinga et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: