Key result
Elite 1500m swimmers use similar parabolic pacing regardless of position, linking medals to faster average velocity.
Why the study?
There was no information to determine if 1500 m race winners select pacing different to other less successful swimmers within the same competition.
Does pacing strategy differ among 1500 m freestyle swimmers based on their final position in World Championships?
Observational (n=143)
Does pacing strategy differ among 1500 m freestyle swimmers based on their final position in World Championships?
p-value: p=<0.05
Elite 1500 m freestyle swimmers use a similar parabolic pacing strategy regardless of their final position, indicating that winning is associated with a faster average velocity rather than a unique pacing profile.
In 1500 m freestyle swimming races, pacing is generally represented by a parabolic or U-shaped curve indicating that swimming velocity is greatest at the start and the last laps of the race while swimmers maintain an even pace through the middle section of the race. However, there is no information to determine if 1500 m race winners select pacing different to other, less successful swimmers within the same competition. Therefore, this investigation aimed to describe the pacing strategies adopted by 1500 m freestyle competitive swimmers in World Championships (long course), from 2003 to 2019 to determine the most effective pacing to obtain victory or a medal. The official overall and split times for 1500 m freestyle races of the Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA) were obtained from the website of this organization. In total, data of 143 swimming performances (71 male and 72 female) were extracted. With the split times, lap times, and position were calculated across the race. To determine differences in the pacing between best- and worst-ranked finalist, swimmers in each race were divided into four groups based on the final position (1st vs. 2nd vs. 3rd vs. 4–8th). All the lap times of the winners of the race were faster than those of participants classified as 4–8th position for men and women races (p < 0.05). However, there were no differences in lap velocity among the different positions achieved at the end of the race when it was normalized by average race velocity. Additionally, there were no differences in the lap-to-lap variability among swimmers with different positions at the end of the race. In summary, both men and women elite swimmers selected parabolic pacing consisting of a fast start in the first lap, an even pace close to their average race velocity in the mid-section of the race (from 50 to 1400 m), followed by an end spurt in the final lap(s). This pattern was very similar in all finalists irrespective of the final position in the race. Hence, the obtaining of a medal in the World Championships was associated to possessing a faster average race velocity rather than a specific pacing profile through the race.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lara et al. (2021) conducted an observational in 1500 m freestyle competitive swimmers (n=143). Final race position (1st, 2nd, 3rd) vs. 4-8th position was evaluated on Lap times and pacing strategy (lap velocity normalized by average race velocity) (p=<0.05). Elite 1500 m freestyle swimmers utilized a similar parabolic pacing strategy regardless of final position, indicating that obtaining a medal was associated with faster average race velocity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: