Why the study?
Blueberries and cranberries have the highest number of RCTs focusing on blood pressure, prompting an analysis of their effects on blood pressure in patients with cardiometabolic diseases.
Does blueberry and cranberry supplementation reduce blood pressure in patients with cardiometabolic diseases?
Does blueberry and cranberry supplementation reduce blood pressure in patients with cardiometabolic diseases?
Blueberry and/or cranberry supplementation had neutral effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with cardiometabolic diseases.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Neutral effects on BP do not support supplementation for cardiometabolic patients; confirms lack of efficacy across pooled RCTs.
Blueberries and cranberries are berry fruits with the highest number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) focusing on blood pressure (BP). This systematic review and meta‐analysis of RCTs analyzed the effects of blueberry and cranberry supplementation alone and in concert with systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) in patients with cardiometabolic diseases. The searches were performed until August 2023 in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase. Studies that examined the effects of blueberry or cranberry intake/supplementation were included. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Rob 2 scale. A meta‐analysis was performed to estimate the effects of blueberry and cranberry supplementation on BP levels in patients with cardiometabolic diseases. A total of 17 articles were included, from which two found significant results from blueberry and/or cranberry supplementation in reducing BP. Pooled results revealed statistically non‐significant reductions of −0.81 mm Hg for SBP (95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.26, 0.63; I 2 = 0%) and −0.15 mm Hg for DBP (95% CI: −1.36, 1.05; I 2 = 27%). Blueberry and/or cranberry supplementation had neutral effects on SBP and DBP in patients with cardiometabolic diseases, regardless of duration or age. Further high‐quality studies are needed to firmly establish clinical efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delpino et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: