Why the study?
The study aimed to use ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to determine the proportion of adults with established, masked, or white-coat hypertension in city and regional centers and evaluate the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment.
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring identify misdiagnosed hypertension compared to clinic blood pressure in Australian adults?
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring identify misdiagnosed hypertension compared to clinic blood pressure in Australian adults?
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reveals a high prevalence of masked hypertension (21%) in the Australian population, highlighting the limitations of relying solely on clinic blood pressure measurements.
BACKGROUND AND METHOD: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study is a national, population-based examination of ∼11 000 adults with a third follow-up phase at 12 years. The aim was to use ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in a subsample (n = 508) of the main Australian Diabetes third follow-up cohort to determine the proportion with established, masked or white-coat hypertension in city and regional centers and the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: Mean age was 58.9 years, BMI was 27.6 kg/m with 53% women. The mean clinic BP was 127/73 mmHg and mean 24-h BP was 121/73 mmHg. Using regression analysis estimations, the predicted ABPM daytime equivalent for the hypertension threshold values of 140/90 mmHg were 136/90 mmHg. There were 43% classified as hypertensive due to either ABPM 24-h more than 130/80 mmHg (17%) or taking antihypertensive therapy (25%). Ambulatory SBP/DBP were higher in men (24-h + 6.4/4.9 mmHg, P < 0.001) compared with women. There was only 3% with white-coat but 21% with masked hypertension indicating 24% misdiagnosis. Based on ABPM, 9% were treated and still hypertensive, which was three times more common in men (14%) than women (4%). Thus 36% had not reached target. There were no differences between urban and rural participants. Based on ABPM, nearly half the participants were hypertensive while only a quarter were taking antihypertensive therapy. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the importance of out-of-office BP assessments and the considerable gaps in effectively diagnosing and treating hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Head et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: