Key result
Antihypertensive therapy was associated with 3- to 4-fold higher odds of elevated blood pressure (>140/90 mmHg) compared to untreated individuals (yearly range OR 3.0-3.97).
Why the study?
Does antihypertensive therapy and visit frequency improve blood pressure control in primary care patients?
Population
532,050 patients managed by 733 general practitioners from 286 clinics Australia-wide who had at least one…
Comparison
Antihypertensive therapy and frequency of… vs No antihypertensive therapy and less frequent…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
2005 to 2010
Authors
Loading...
Treated patients show poorer BP control; leaves open whether intensified visits or therapy improve outcomes in primary care.
Observational (n=532,050)
Yes
Does antihypertensive therapy and visit frequency improve blood pressure control in primary care patients?
Effect estimate: OR 3.0-3.97 (95% CI 2.93-3.83 to 3.08-4.10)
Despite antihypertensive therapy, a significant proportion of primary care patients in Australia fail to achieve target blood pressure, highlighting the need for more intensive management.
Carrington et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=532,050). Antihypertensive therapy vs. No antihypertensive therapy was evaluated on Elevated blood pressure >140/90 mmHg (OR 3.0-3.97, 95% CI 2.93-3.83 to 3.08-4.10). Antihypertensive therapy was associated with 3- to 4-fold higher odds of elevated blood pressure (>140/90 mmHg) compared to untreated individuals (yearly range OR 3.0-3.97).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: