Why the study?
Does an indirect PEDV ELISA accurately detect swine antibodies against PEDV compared to the serum neutralization test?
Does an indirect PEDV ELISA accurately detect swine antibodies against PEDV compared to the serum neutralization test?
The PEDV ELISA is a useful serodiagnostic screening test at the herd level for detecting swine antibodies against PEDV.
May support PEDV ELISA for herd-level swine screening; leaves open prospective validation against SN test.
An indirect porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) virus (PEDV) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was compared with the serum neutralization (SN) test by testing 46 samples from experimentally infected sows, 73 samples from naive sows, and 1,024 field sow samples from 48 commercial swine farms of undefined PED status. The SN test and the ELISA were performed using PEDV, KPEDV-9 strain. Viral proteins as a coating antigen of PEDV ELISA were extracted from the cytoplasm of PEDV-infected Vero cells using a non-ionic detergent, Triton X-100, and a simple protocol of PEDV ELISA was followed. The presence of antibodies in these experimental samples was confirmed by SN and ELISA in which the sensitivity of the ELISA was 89.1%, and the corresponding specificity was 94.5%. On testing 1,024 field samples, an overall agreement of 84.2% was generated between the SN and ELISA. This study demonstrates that the PEDV ELISA is a useful serodiagnostic screening test at herd level for detecting swine antibodies against PEDV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: