Why the study?
Does waist-to-height ratio accurately predict cardiovascular risk factors in pre-school children compared to BMI and waist circumference?
Does waist-to-height ratio accurately predict cardiovascular risk factors in pre-school children compared to BMI and waist circumference?
A waist-to-height ratio cut-off of 0.5 is a valid screening tool for cardiovascular risk factors in pre-school children, performing comparably to BMI and waist circumference.
BACKGROUND: Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) has been recommended as a tool for predicting cardiovascular risk in children. However, there is little evidence about the accuracy of using WHtR as a predictor of disease risk in pre-school children. AIMS: To assess the accuracy of waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) as well as to determine the optimal cut-off values for each of these measures in order to identify pre-school children with cardiovascular risks. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 315 children between 3-4 years of age. Multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease (MRFCD) were defined as having two or more of the following conditions: HDL-c < 35 mg/dL, LDL-c ≥ 110 mg/dL, triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL and systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90(th) percentile. RESULTS: The accuracy of WHtR in identifying cardiovascular risk in pre-school children was not significantly different compared to BMI or WC, for both sexes. The optimal cut-off measures for predicting cardiovascular risk in boys and girls, respectively, were as follows: 0.51 and 0.49 for WHtR; 0.61 and 0.69 for BMI Z-score; and 51.2 cm and 50.2 cm for WC. CONCLUSIONS: The data support the use of a 0.5 cut-off value for WHtR to predict cardiovascular risk factors among pre-school children and suggest that using WHtR is comparable to both BMI and WC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campagnolo et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: