Key result
The waist-to-height ratio effectively identified cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents, achieving an AUC of 0.89-0.90 for CMR1 with a sensitivity of 0.91 at a cut-off of 0.467.
Why the study?
Does the waist-to-height ratio effectively identify cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents compared to other obesity indexes?
Cross-Sectional (n=3,556)
Yes
Does the waist-to-height ratio effectively identify cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents compared to other obesity indexes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The waist-to-height ratio is a simple, accurate, and practical screening tool for detecting cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents.
AIM: We evaluated how effectively the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) identified cardiometabolic risk (CMR) in children and adolescents, compared with the tri-ponderal mass index, percentage of body fat and other obesity indexes. METHODS: Eligible subjects were recruited from three metropolitan regions of China from May 2013 to June 2014. Subjects with at least three of the following abnormalities - hypertension, dyslipidemia, elevated fasting blood glucose and central obesity - were defined as CMR1 and children with at least two were defined as CMR2. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare how effectively obesity indexes predicted CMR. RESULTS: We recruited 3556 subjects aged 7-18 years. All five obesity indexes showed good, comparable performances in identifying CMR and the AUCs ranged from 0.89 to 0.90 for CMR1 and 0.83 to 0.85 for CMR2. The cut-off of 0.467 for WHtR achieved a sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.80 for predicting CMR1, with the best cut-offs being 0.463 for boys and 0.469 for girls. CONCLUSION: The WHtR was a superior and practical screening tool for detecting CMR in this paediatric population, as it provided comparable accuracy to other methods and just required a simple calculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiometabolic risk (n=3,556). Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) vs. Tri-ponderal mass index, percentage of body fat and other obesity indexes was evaluated on Cardiometabolic risk (CMR1: ≥3 abnormalities; CMR2: ≥2 abnormalities) (AUC 0.89-0.90 for CMR1). The waist-to-height ratio effectively identified cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents, achieving an AUC of 0.89-0.90 for CMR1 with a sensitivity of 0.91 at a cut-off of 0.467.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: