Why the study?
What are the prognostic factors for outcome in poor grade patients after intracranial aneurysm rupture?
What are the prognostic factors for outcome in poor grade patients after intracranial aneurysm rupture?
Surgical treatment, admission neurological grade, age, initial systolic blood pressure, and aneurysm size are the most important prognostic factors for outcome in poor grade patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
May aid prognostication in poor-grade aneurysmal SAH; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
When is the outlook hopeless after rupture of an intracranial aneurysm? Some data bearing on the answer to this important question were obtained in a prospective, multicenter trial of 184 poor grade patients in a study of the calcium antagonist nimodipine. Entry was within 3 days of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The admission work-up included angiography of the anterior and posterior circulations and computed tomographic (CT) scans. The angiograms were repeated as close to Day 8 post-SAH as possible, and the CT scans were repeated at 3 months at the time of follow-up neurological assessment. Radiological assessment was performed independently of knowledge of drug treatment or patient outcome. A discriminant function analysis indicated that the relative importance of factors prognostic for outcome was, in order of importance: whether the patient was treated surgically, neurological grade on admission, age, initial systolic blood pressure, and aneurysm size. The discriminant function analysis correctly classified 80% of our cases. A constellation of poor prognostic features will aid the neurosurgeon in treating a patient conservatively and appropriately advising relatives. The ultimate decision on how to treat a given patient continues to depend partly on clinical judgement, which remains intuitive and subject to influences not studied here.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Disney et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: