Key result
The CHA2DS2-VASc score identified an additional 26 patients (43% of those requiring anticoagulation) at high risk for thromboembolic complications who would have been classified as lower risk by the CHADS2 score.
Why the study?
Does risk stratification with the CHA2DS2-VASc score improve the identification of high thromboembolic risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation compared to the CHADS2 score?
Observational (n=68)
No
Does risk stratification with the CHA2DS2-VASc score improve the identification of high thromboembolic risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation compared to the CHADS2 score?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The CHA2DS2-VASc score effectively identifies a significant proportion of AF patients at high thromboembolic risk who would otherwise be classified as low or intermediate risk by the CHADS2 score.
BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation therapy is followed by analysis of factors used in the CHA2DS2-VASc score and assessing the risk of bleeding (HAS-BLED). THE AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to evaluate in 'real life' risk stratification scores in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 81 consecutive patients who had not yet received anticoagulation, 68 were finally enrolled after exclusion criteria. Patients were analyzed related to risk scores: CHADS2 ≥ 2 (group I) vs. CHADS2 < 2 and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 (group II) and gender. Patients at high thromboembolic risk were treated with warfarin, after consideration of the patient's decision. RESULTS: At high risk of thromboembolic complications were 61 patients (90%). In 26 subjects (43%, 15 women - 57%) indication for anticoagulation was established by CHA2DS2-VASc. When compared to CHADS2 ≥ 2, these patients were younger (72 ±10 years vs. 63 ±10 years, p = 0.0002), less frequently burdened with arterial hypertension (p = 0.03) and had lower risk in HAS-BLED (1.23 ±0.65 vs. 0.81 ±0.49, p = 0.03). Seven patients (10%) did not require anticoagulation (CHA2DS2-VASc = 0). Compared to men, women more often had ischemic stroke (2 vs. 18%, p = 0.03), but less coronary artery disease (58 vs. 25%, p = 0.005). During 18 months on warfarin, bleeding occurred in 9 patients (13%, 6 women). On dual antiplatelet therapy were 11 patients (16%). No thromboembolic complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED schemata easily identify real low and high thromboembolic risk patients and bleeding risk. It seems that women present higher risk of bleeding, but less frequent use of antiplatelet therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciuruś et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=68). CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED risk stratification vs. CHADS2 risk stratification was evaluated on Reclassification of thromboembolic risk. The CHA2DS2-VASc score identified an additional 26 patients (43% of those requiring anticoagulation) at high risk for thromboembolic complications who would have been classified as lower risk by the CHADS2 score.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: