Key result
Syncope in an 82-year-old man with a pacemaker was identified as being caused by cross-stimulation due to the inadvertent switching of the atrial and ventricular leads at the pacemaker header.
Why the study?
Syncope in a patient with a pacemaker is a serious event requiring urgent action to ascertain its cause, with approximately 5% of cases caused by pacemaker system malfunction.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights the rare complication of cross-stimulation due to switched pacemaker leads, which can present late as syncope triggered by atrial arrhythmias.
Pacemaker malfunction warrants consideration in syncope despite normal lead positions on imaging; this case leaves open optimal diagnostic strategies for occult device issues.
BACKGROUND: Syncope in a patient with a pacemaker is a serious event requiring urgent action to ascertain its cause. Around 5% of cases are due to a pacemaker system malfunction. CASE SUMMARY: An 82-year-old man underwent dual-chamber permanent pacemaker implantation due to intermittent high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) in sinus rhythm. Nine months later, the patient reported episodes of syncope. The chest X-ray showed both leads to be at their expected positions. The electrocardiography (ECG) showed common atrial flutter. Ventricular capture during pacing in atrial demand pacing (AAI) mode confirmed cross-stimulation due to the switching of the atrial and ventricular leads at the pacemaker header. DISCUSSION: Cross-stimulation is a rare possibility in a differential diagnosis of causes of syncope. The diagnosis is frequently made during the procedure or a few hours later. The lack of symptoms during 9 months in this case was likely due to the patient having normal sinus rhythm with preserved AV conduction most of the time, as well as ventricular capture from the atrial lead related to non-sensed P waves. When atrial arrhythmias occurred, the sensing of the F waves inhibited ventricular pacing. In order to avoid this complication, in patients with intermittent bradycardia, pacing at a slightly higher heart rate during implantation of the device should be recommended to see the chamber paced with the surface ECG connected to the device interrogator. The ECG and electrogram (EGM) should correlate during device interrogation in order to identify this complication.).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duran et al. (2021) conducted a case report in Syncope due to pacemaker cross-stimulation (n=1). Switched atrial and ventricular leads at the pacemaker header was evaluated on Syncope due to cross-stimulation. Syncope in an 82-year-old man with a pacemaker was identified as being caused by cross-stimulation due to the inadvertent switching of the atrial and ventricular leads at the pacemaker header.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: