Key result
Pulse wave velocity estimated by Mobil-O-Graph on the brachial artery significantly discriminated the dialysis population from controls (mean difference of 8.4 years in vascular age, p<0.001), whereas pulse pressure did not.
Why the study?
Does PWV obtained by Mobil-O-Graph better discriminate vascular aging than pulse pressure in hemodialysis patients?
Observational (n=243)
Yes
Does PWV obtained by Mobil-O-Graph better discriminate vascular aging than pulse pressure in hemodialysis patients?
Mean Difference: 8.4 (95% CI 3.8–12.9)
p-value: p=<0.001
Assessing PWV on the brachial artery using a Mobil-O-Graph is a valid and more sensitive alternative to pulse pressure for detecting vascular aging in hemodialysis patients.
Mobil-O-Graph PWV may better detect vascular aging than pulse pressure in hemodialysis; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) accelerates vascular stiffening related to age. Arterial stiffness may be evaluated measuring the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) or more simply, as recommended by KDOQI, monitoring pulse pressure (PP). Both correlate to survival and incidence of cardiovascular disease. PWV can also be estimated on the brachial artery using a Mobil-O-Graph; a non-operator dependent automatic device. The aim was to analyse whether, in a dialysis population, PWV obtained by Mobil-O-Graph (MogPWV) is more sensitive for vascular aging than PP. METHODS: A cohort of 143 patients from 4 dialysis units has been followed measuring MogPWV and PP every 3 to 6 months and compared to a control group with the same risk factors but an eGFR > 30 ml/min. RESULTS: MogPWV contrarily to PP did discriminate the dialysis population from the control group. The mean difference translated in age between the two populations was 8.4 years. The increase in MogPWV, as a function of age, was more rapid in the dialysis group. 13.3% of the dialysis patients but only 3.0% of the control group were outliers for MogPWV. The mortality rate (16 out of 143) was similar in outliers and inliers (7.4 and 8.0%/year). Stratifying patients according to MogPWV, a significant difference in survival was seen. A high parathormone (PTH) and to be dialysed for a hypertensive nephropathy were associated to a higher baseline MogPWV. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing PWV on the brachial artery using a Mobil-O-Graph is a valid and simple alternative, which, in the dialysis population, is more sensitive for vascular aging than PP. As demonstrated in previous studies PWV correlates to mortality. Among specific CKD risk factors only PTH is associated with a higher baseline PWV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02327962.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salvadé et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Hemodialysis / Chronic Kidney Disease (n=243). Pulse Wave Velocity estimated by Mobil-O-Graph (MogPWV) vs. Pulse Pressure (PP) was evaluated on Discrimination of the dialysis population from the control group for vascular aging (MD 8.4 years, 95% CI 3.8-12.9, p=<0.001). Pulse wave velocity estimated by Mobil-O-Graph on the brachial artery significantly discriminated the dialysis population from controls (mean difference of 8.4 years in vascular age, p<0.001), whereas pulse pressure did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: