Key result
Concomitant surgery during aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic annulus significantly increased the risk of long-term mortality (HR 5.04) compared to isolated valve replacement.
Why the study?
What are the long-term mortality predictors in patients with a small aortic annulus undergoing aortic valve replacement with a 19- or 21-mm bioprosthesis?
Observational (n=101)
No
What are the long-term mortality predictors in patients with a small aortic annulus undergoing aortic valve replacement with a 19- or 21-mm bioprosthesis?
Hazard Ratio: 5.04 (95% CI 1.41–18.02)
p-value: p=0.01
In patients with a small aortic annulus undergoing aortic valve replacement with a 19- or 21-mm bioprosthesis, concomitant surgery and age were significant predictors of long-term mortality, whereas prosthesis-patient mismatch (valve index < 0.75 cm2/m2) was not.
Concomitant surgery in small-annulus AVR may increase mortality risk; should not yet change practice pending randomized confirmation.
Introduction: Replacement of the aortic valve in patients with a small aortic annulus is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A prosthesis-patient mismatch is one of the main problems associated with failed valves in this patient population. Objective: To evaluate the long-term mortality predictors in patients with a small aortic annulus undergoing aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, a total of 101 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement from January 2000 to December 2010 were studied. There were 81 (80.19%) women with a mean age of 52.81±18.4 years. Severe aortic stenosis was the main indication for surgery in 54 (53.4%) patients. Posterior annulus enlargement was performed in 16 (15.8%) patients. Overall, 54 (53.41%) patients underwent concomitant surgery: 28 (27.5%) underwent mitral valve replacement, and 13 (12.7%) underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Results: Mean valve index was 0.82±0.08 cm(2)/m(2). Overall, 17 (16.83%) patients had a valve index lower than 0.75 cm(2)/m(2), without statistical significance for mortality (P=0.12). The overall 10-year survival rate was 83.17%. The rate for patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement was 91.3% and 73.1% (P=0.02) for patients who underwent concomitant surgery. In the univariate analysis, the main predictors of mortality were preoperative ejection fraction (P=0.02; HR 0.01) and EuroSCORE II results (P=0.00000042; HR 1.13). In the multivariate analysis, the main predictors of mortality were age (P=0.01, HR 1.04) and concomitant surgery (P=0.01, HR 5.04). Those relationships were statistically significant. Conclusion: A valve index of < 0.75 cm(2)/m(2) did not affect 10-year survival. However, concomitant surgery and age significantly affected mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Small aortic annulus requiring aortic valve replacement (n=101). Concomitant surgery vs. Isolated aortic valve replacement was evaluated on Long-term mortality (HR 5.04, 95% CI 1.41-18.02, p=0.01). Concomitant surgery during aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic annulus significantly increased the risk of long-term mortality (HR 5.04) compared to isolated valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: