Key result
This review investigates the differences and potential advantages of the Intraclude catheter compared to the Endoclamp for intraluminal aortic occlusion in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
Does the Intraclude catheter offer advantages over the Endoclamp catheter for intraluminal aortic occlusion in minimally invasive cardiac surgery?
Does the Intraclude catheter offer advantages over the Endoclamp catheter for intraluminal aortic occlusion in minimally invasive cardiac surgery?
This review discusses the introduction of the Intraclude catheter as a potentially advantageous alternative to the Endoclamp for intraluminal aortic occlusion in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
No practice change indicated for aortic occlusion devices; leaves open whether Intraclude improves outcomes versus Endoclamp.
Marullo et al. (2015) conducted a review in Minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Intraclude catheter vs. Endoclamp was evaluated. This review investigates the differences and potential advantages of the Intraclude catheter compared to the Endoclamp for intraluminal aortic occlusion in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: