Key result
The Cardiio smartphone app accurately measured heart rate at rest and after exercise using fingertip photoplethysmography (r≥0.994), while facial detection was less accurate post-exercise.
Why the study?
Does the Cardiio smartphone app accurately measure heart rate compared to a 12-lead ECG in healthy young adults at rest and after exercise?
Population
40 healthy participants between 18 and 40 years old with no current medical conditions and not taking…
Comparison
Heart rate measurement using the Cardiio… vs Continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram as the…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Fingertip PPG smartphone apps may enable convenient HR monitoring; leaves open validation in clinical populations before adoption.
Cross-Sectional (n=40)
No
Does the Cardiio smartphone app accurately measure heart rate compared to a 12-lead ECG in healthy young adults at rest and after exercise?
Effect estimate: r=0.997, RMSE=1.03 beats/min
p-value: p=<0.001
The Cardiio smartphone app provides accurate heart rate measurements at rest and after exercise using fingertip photoplethysmography, while facial detection is less accurate post-exercise due to body motion.
Yan et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=40). Cardiio smartphone app vs. 12-lead electrocardiogram was evaluated on Accuracy of heart rate measurements (RMSE and correlation) (r=0.997, RMSE=1.03 beats/min, p=<0.001). The Cardiio smartphone app accurately measured heart rate at rest and after exercise using fingertip photoplethysmography (r≥0.994), while facial detection was less accurate post-exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: