Key result
A time-to-isolation guided cryoablation protocol resulted in similar freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence at one year compared to a fixed protocol (73.6% vs 75.7%; p=0.75).
Why the study?
Does a TTI-guided ablation protocol reduce procedure duration without compromising efficacy compared to a fixed freeze protocol in patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI?
Cohort (n=200)
Does a TTI-guided ablation protocol reduce procedure duration without compromising efficacy compared to a fixed freeze protocol in patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI?
Absolute Event Rate: 73.6% vs 75.7%
p-value: p=0.75
A TTI-guided cryoenergy titration strategy significantly reduces procedure and fluoroscopy times while maintaining similar 1-year efficacy compared to a fixed ablation protocol.
Time-to-isolation guided cryoablation was associated with similar one-year efficacy; leaves open whether it shortens procedures or improves safety in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: The optimal freeze duration in cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is unknown. The 3rd generation cryoballoon facilitates observation of the time-to-isolation (TTI) and thereby enables individualized cryoenergy titration. To evaluate the efficacy of an individualized freeze duration we compared the clinical outcome of patients treated with a TTI-guided ablation protocol to the outcome of patients treated with a fixed ablation protocol. METHODS: We compared 100 patients treated with the 3rd generation cryoballoon applying a TTI-based protocol (TTI group) to 100 patients treated by a fixed freeze protocol (fixed group). In the fixed group a 240s freeze cycle was followed by a 240s bonus freeze after acute PV isolation. In the TTI group freeze duration was 180s if TTI was ≥30s and reduced to only 120s, if TTI was <30s. In case of a TTI >60s a 180s bonus freeze was applied. RESULTS: Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence off class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs after one year was not different between the TTI group (73.6%) and the fixed group (75.7%; p=0.75). Mean procedure duration was 85.8±27.3min in the TTI group compared to 115.7±27.1min in the fixed group (p<0.001). Mean fluoroscopy time was 17.5±6.6min in the TTI group and 22.5±9.8min in the fixed group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TTI-guided cryoenergy titration leads to reduced procedure duration and fluoroscopy time and appears to be as effective as a fixed ablation strategy. A single 2-minute freeze seems to be sufficient in case of short TTI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pott et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Atrial arrhythmia (n=200). Time-to-isolation (TTI)-guided ablation protocol vs. Fixed freeze protocol (240s freeze + 240s bonus) was evaluated on Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence off class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs after one year (p=0.75). A time-to-isolation guided cryoablation protocol resulted in similar freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence at one year compared to a fixed protocol (73.6% vs 75.7%; p=0.75).