Key result
A 12-week exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with refractory angina significantly increased time to ischemic threshold compared to medical therapy alone (MD 98.44 s; p=0.03).
Why the study?
Evidence regarding the safety and anti-ischemic effects of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with refractory angina remains limited.
Does a 12-week exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve symptoms, functional capacity, and ischemic burden in patients with refractory angina?
RCT (n=45)
randomized
No
Does a 12-week exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve symptoms, functional capacity, and ischemic burden in patients with refractory angina?
Mean Difference: 98.44
p-value: p=0.03
A 12-week exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program safely improves exercise duration, angina symptoms, and ischemic burden in patients with refractory angina.
Supports exercise rehabilitation in refractory angina; extends RCT evidence to objective gains in capacity and ischemia.
BACKGROUND: Evidence on the safety and anti-ischemic effects of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ECR) in patients with refractory angina (RA) remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a 12-week ECR program in patients with RA, focusing on improvements in symptoms, functional capacity, and ischemic burden assessed by exercise stress echocardiography (ESE). METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial evaluating a 12-week ECR program in patients with RA. Forty-five patients were randomized to either the rehabilitation group (RG), receiving ECR, or the control group (CG), receiving medical treatment (MT) alone. Outcomes included mortality, cardiovascular events, anginal symptoms, and parameters from ESE and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: In ESE, exercise duration was significantly greater in RGpost (after ECR) compared to RGpre (before ECR) (∆ = 63.24 ± 19.87 s; p < 0.01). Angina quantification was lower in RGpost than in RGpre, CGpost (after MT alone), and CGpre (before MT alone) (∆ = -1.64 ± 0.48 n, p < 0.01; -3.10 ± 0.97 n, p < 0.01; and -2.73 ± 0.92 n, p = 0.01, respectively). The angina threshold was higher in RGpost than in RGpre and CGpost (∆ = 89.66 ± 33.16 s, p = 0.04; and 111.76 ± 42.25 s, p = 0.04, respectively). Improvement in ischemic burden on ESE was demonstrated by increased time to ischemic threshold in RGpost compared to RGpre, CGpost, and CGpre (∆ = 83.23 ± 21.84 s, p < 0.01; 98.44 ± 35.11 s, p = 0.03; and 109.34 ± 34.00 s, p < 0.01, respectively). In CPET, RGpost showed increased exercise duration (∆ = 104.54 ± 28.09 s, p < 0.01) and distance covered (∆ = 131.23 ± 30.48 m, p < 0.01) compared to RGpre. No significant differences in VO2 were observed between groups. Two patients in the CG group died. One patient in the RG group experienced prolonged angina during training. No significant differences in major cardiovascular events were observed between groups. CONCLUSION: The 12-week ECR-program was safe and effective in improving exercise duration, distance covered and ischemic burden on ESE in patients with RA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dourado et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in refractory angina (RA) (n=45). exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ECR) vs. medical treatment (MT) alone was evaluated on time to ischemic threshold on exercise stress echocardiography (MD 98.44 s, p=0.03). A 12-week exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with refractory angina significantly increased time to ischemic threshold compared to medical therapy alone (MD 98.44 s; p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: