Key result
In US adults with type 2 diabetes, only 27.7% achieved recommended levels for ≥3 cardiovascular risk factors, with higher polysocial risk scores linked to poorer control.
Why the study?
Data were limited on composite cardiovascular risk factor control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, prompting an evaluation of disparities based on recent recommendations and relationships to social determinants of health.
Cohort
Yes
Composite cardiovascular risk factor control remains poor in US adults with T2DM, with significant disparities linked to social determinants of health.
Persistent gaps in T2DM risk factor control may reflect SDOH barriers; leaves open targeted intervention trials.
Background: Data are limited on composite cardiovascular risk factor control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aims to identify disparities in cardiovascular risk factor control based on most recent recommendations and relationships to social determinants of health in a large-scale real-world cohort of US adults. Methods: -tests for mean differences, and multiple logistic regression to assess the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors on risk factor control. Results: The study revealed low risk factor control with only 27.7 % of participants achieving recommended levels for three or more risk factors (RFs) and 4.9 % for four or more RFs. Overall, while 81.0% were at target for HbA1c, only 37.9% were at target for BP and 10.4% for LDL-C. Notably, only 1.9 % and 6.9 % were at target for HbA1c, LDL-C, and BP together, based on current and prior recommendations, respectively. Significant disparities were observed across race/ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic lines with 43.1 % of Asian participants at control for ≥3 RFs compared to 21.1 % of non-Hispanic black participants. In logistic regression analysis, factors such as higher income, higher educational attainment, and health insurance were associated with better RF control, while higher polysocial risk scores linked to poorer control. Conclusions: Despite some progress in managing individual CVD risk factors in T2DM, overall composite risk factor control remains poor, especially among underrepresented and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. The findings highlight the necessity for integrated healthcare strategies that address both medical and social needs to improve control of CVD risk factors and outcomes in T2DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golden et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Social determinants of health and demographic factors was evaluated on Achieving recommended levels for three or more cardiovascular risk factors. In US adults with type 2 diabetes, only 27.7% achieved recommended levels for ≥3 cardiovascular risk factors, with higher polysocial risk scores linked to poorer control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: