Key result
Being more socioeconomically deprived was associated with a higher likelihood of suboptimal glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
This study aimed to analyze glycemic control and multifactorial cardiovascular control targets in patients with T2DM in primary care according to sex and socioeconomic status.
Do socioeconomic status and sex affect glycemic and multifactorial cardiovascular control in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=68,535)
Yes
Do socioeconomic status and sex affect glycemic and multifactorial cardiovascular control in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Lower socioeconomic status is associated with suboptimal glycemic control, and female sex is associated with poorer multifactorial cardiovascular risk factor control in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Socioeconomic deprivation may warrant attention in type 2 diabetes care; leaves open whether interventions mitigate glycemic disparities.
Aim: This study aimed to analyze glycemic control and multifactorial cardiovascular control targets in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in primary care according to sex and socioeconomic status (SES). Materials and methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional, and multicenter study. We analyzed all the patients with T2DMM aged between 40 and 75 years in Madrid city (113,265) through electronic health records from 01 August 2017 to 31 July 2018. SES was defined by an area-level socioeconomic index stratified by quintiles (1st quintile: more affluent). Outcomes: ]. Multilevel logistic regression models analyzed factors associated with suboptimal glycemic control. Results: In total 43.2% were women. Glycemic control was achieved by 63% of patients (women: 64.2% vs. men: 62.4%). Being more deprived was associated with suboptimal glycemic control (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10-1.32); however, sex was not related (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-1.01). The optimal 3-factor control target was reached by 10.3% of patients (women: 9.3% vs. men: 11.2%), especially those in the 5th quintile of SES. The 4-factor control was achieved by 6.6% of the sample. In the 3-factor control target, being women was related to the suboptimal 3-factor control target (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.19- 1.34) but only belonging to SES 4th quintile was related to the unachieved target (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.07). Conclusion: Suboptimal glycemic control was associated with being less affluent and suboptimal 3-factor control target was associated with being women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ares-Blanco et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes (n=68,535). Socioeconomic deprivation (5th quintile) vs. Least deprived (1st quintile) was evaluated on Suboptimal glycemic control (HbA1c > 7%) (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.32). Being more socioeconomically deprived was associated with a higher likelihood of suboptimal glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: