Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a Class III functional appliance [the removable mandibular retractor (RMR)] in the early treatment of skeletal Class III deformities. SET-UP: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Orthodontic Department, University of Al-Baath Dental School, Hamah, Syria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-seven skeletal Class III patients were recruited, distributed randomly into two groups: 1) treatment group (T) with the RMR: 33 patients (17 males and 16 females) with a mean age of 7.5 ± 1.33 years, 2) control group (C): 34 patients (15 males and 19 females) with a mean age of 7.3 ± 1.58 years. Lateral cephalograms were taken at the start of treatment (T1-T) or at the start of the observation period (T1-C) and after 14.5 ± 0.1 months (both groups). Soft- and hard-tissue changes in both groups were evaluated. RESULTS: The main significant findings in the treatment group were 1) anterior morphogenetic rotation of the mandible as a result of upward and forward condylar growth; 2) significant increase in maxillary length; 3) significant increase in maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion; 4) significant decrease in mandibular dentoalveolar protrusion; 5) significant protrusion of the upper lip; 6) significant retrusion of the lower lip; and 7) significant reduction in nasolabial angle. CONCLUSION: The RMR is an effective appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class III patients in the early mixed dentition in the short term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saleh et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: