Key result
Sympathoexcitatory stimuli elicited highly reproducible pressor responses within individuals, whereas the reproducibility of the muscle sympathetic nerve activity response was less consistent.
Why the study?
Limited studies have comprehensively examined the reproducibility of neurocardiovascular responses to common laboratory-based sympathoexcitatory stimuli.
What is the reproducibility of neurocardiovascular responses to common laboratory-based sympathoexcitatory stimuli in young adults?
Observational
What is the reproducibility of neurocardiovascular responses to common laboratory-based sympathoexcitatory stimuli in young adults?
In young adults, the pressor response to common sympathoexcitatory stimuli is highly reproducible within individuals, but the muscle sympathetic nerve activity response is less consistent.
Pressor responses may reliably index individual sympathoexcitation; leaves open MSNA utility for within-subject comparisons.
The magnitude of the increases in blood pressure and muscle sympathetic nerve activity in response to sympathoexcitatory stimuli such as static handgrip, postexercise ischemia, and the cold pressor test are commonly used to assess neurocardiovascular responsiveness. However, limited studies have comprehensively examined the reproducibility of these responses. We demonstrate that the reproducibility of the pressor response to these perturbations was very good within an individual, whereas the reproducibility of the MSNA response was less consistent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dillon et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Young adults. Sympathoexcitatory stimuli (static handgrip, postexercise ischemia, cold pressor test) was evaluated on Reproducibility of pressor and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) responses. Sympathoexcitatory stimuli elicited highly reproducible pressor responses within individuals, whereas the reproducibility of the muscle sympathetic nerve activity response was less consistent.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: