The authors report specific contact resistance (ρc) values for Mo-, Ti-, TiW-, Pd-, and Pt-based Ohmic contacts to n+-In0.86Ga0.14As that are deposited with either collimated sputter or electron-beam deposition. Palladium-based contacts with 5 nm of electron-beam evaporated Pd have a specific contact resistance of 7.6 ± 0.5 × 10−9 Ω cm2, while identical collimated sputter deposited contacts have a specific contact resistance of 4.1 ± 0.4 × 10−9 Ω cm2. Contacts with a very thin evaporated Pd layer (2 nm) or a sputtered Pd/Ti 1/1 nm × 4 multilayer have stable ρc values of 5.4 ± 0.5 × 10−9 and 5.0 ± 0.5 × 10−9 Ω cm2, respectively, after 2 h at 270 °C. The ρc of sputter deposited TiW-based contacts is an order of magnitude lower than for identical evaporated contacts (1.6 ± 0.3 × 10−8 vs 2.6 ± 0.3 × 10−7 Ω cm2) and is stable during annealing, while sputter deposition of Pt-based contacts yields rc values that are half an order of magnitude lower than similar evaporated contacts (4.5 ± 1.0 × 10−9 vs 1.7 ± 0.2 × 10−8 Ω cm2). However, the ρc values of the sputtered Pt contacts approach those of evaporated contacts after annealing. Surface preparations consisting of UV-ozone treatments followed by immersion in buffered oxide etch or ammonium hydroxide yield ρc values that are half an order of magnitude lower than values yielded by similar preparations in which HCl is used for oxide removal. The authors also discuss how to avoid over- and underestimation artifacts that may be encountered in measurements of very low specific contact resistances of Ohmic contacts to semiconductors that have low sheet resistances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dormaier et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: