Why the study?
Does thyroxine-induced cardiac hypertrophy alter the number and volume of total and perfused microvessels in the heart of rabbits?
Does thyroxine-induced cardiac hypertrophy alter the number and volume of total and perfused microvessels in the heart of rabbits?
T4-induced cardiac hypertrophy decreases total capillary density but increases the proportion of perfused capillaries and coronary blood flow to maintain physiological diffusion distances.
Does not support changes in thyroxine use; leaves open whether similar microvascular adaptation occurs in human hyperthyroidism.
The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the effects of thyroxine (T4), which induces myocardial hypertrophy, on the number per square millimetre and volume per cubic millimetre of both the total and perfused portions of the arteriolar and capillary beds of the heart. Studies were conducted in the subendocardial and subepicardial regions of the left ventricle of anesthetized open-chest rabbits. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (i.v.) or radioactive microspheres (intra-atrial) were injected to label the perfused microvessels or to determine coronary flow in three groups of rabbits: controls, and rabbits given 0.5 mg/kg T4 for 3 days and for 16 days. Fluorescent photography was used to identify the perfused microvessels. An alkaline phosphatase stain was employed to locate the total microvascular bed. There were 2369 +/- 638 (SD) capillaries/mm2 and 4 +/- 3 arterioles/mm2 in control hearts. These decreased significantly to 1380 +/- 199/mm2 and 1 +/- 1/mm2, respectively, after 16 days of T4. In controls, 60 +/- 5% of the capillaries and 59 +/- 21% of the arterioles were perfused. This increased significantly to 90 +/- 5 and 86 +/- 18%, respectively, by 16 days of T4 treatment. Similar changes, although smaller, were observed after 3 days of T4. Coronary blood flow increased to 1.7 times control after 3 days and 2.9 times after 16 days of T4. No significant subepicardial versus subendocardial differences were observed in any condition or measurement. Thus, the physiological response to the increased work and increase in anatomic minimum diffusion distance is to increase flow and the proportion of the capillary bed perfused to at least maintain physiological diffusion distances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiss et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: