Key result
Transcatheter mitral valve repair using the MitraClip device achieved a 92% procedural success rate with significant and sustained improvement in heart failure symptoms and MR grade over 1-year follow-up.
Why the study?
The therapeutic results of transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip in Qatar remained to be elucidated.
Observational (n=25)
No
Transcatheter mitral valve repair using the MitraClip device is safe and effective for reducing severe mitral regurgitation and improving functional status in a high-risk Qatari population.
Supports TMVr feasibility in high-risk Qatari patients; extends global data but leaves open need for larger prospective studies.
Background: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr), using MitraClip ® , is a safe and effective procedure for severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR). However, the therapeutic results of MitraClip ® in Qatar remain to be elucidated. A total of 25 patients (mean age 60 ± 14.5 years, 64% males) with symptomatic severe MR and prohibitive surgical risks were enrolled in this study. The procedural success rate was 92% to achieve mild residual MR. There was no periprocedural death. All patients experienced significant improvement in heart failure symptoms and MR grade postprocedure with sustained improvement over 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: The TMVr procedure using the MitraClip ® device was safe and resulted in meaningful and sustained functional status and echocardiographic parameter improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Asmi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Symptomatic severe mitral valve regurgitation (n=25). Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) using MitraClip was evaluated on Procedural success rate (MR grade ≤2+ without associated complications). Transcatheter mitral valve repair using the MitraClip device achieved a 92% procedural success rate with significant and sustained improvement in heart failure symptoms and MR grade over 1-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: