Key result
The designed infrared-based heart rate monitoring system demonstrated high accuracy with an average error rate of 1.85% when compared to a standard blood pressure monitor.
Why the study?
Many individuals risk stress-related health conditions because affordable and easy-to-operate heart rate measuring devices are not widely available.
Population
50 samples of heart rates tested in a laboratory
Comparison
Infrared-based heart rate monitoring system vs Blood Pressure Monitor
Design
Device design and laboratory performance validation study
Authors
Loading...
May aid non-invasive device development; leaves open clinical validation trials before practice adoption.
The designed low-cost, portable infrared-based heart rate monitoring system demonstrated high accuracy with a 1.85% average error rate compared to a standard blood pressure monitor.
Iyaomolere et al. (2019) studied this question. Infrared-based heart rate monitoring (HRM) system vs. Blood Pressure Monitor was evaluated on Average error rate of heart rate measurement. The designed infrared-based heart rate monitoring system demonstrated high accuracy with an average error rate of 1.85% when compared to a standard blood pressure monitor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: