Key result
Intravascular ultrasound of the ascending aorta yielded diameters 2.3 mm larger than TTE (95% CI 14.21-17.13; P=0.034), but did not differ significantly from CT aortography (P=0.985).
Why the study?
Aortic stiffness is a recognized cardiovascular risk factor, motivating an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound imaging for evaluating aortic elastic properties.
Does intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging provide comparable measurements of ascending aortic diameter compared to TTE and CT in patients with enlarged ascending aortas?
Observational (n=12)
Does intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging provide comparable measurements of ascending aortic diameter compared to TTE and CT in patients with enlarged ascending aortas?
Mean Difference: 2.3 (95% CI 14.21–17.13)
p-value: p=0.034
IVUS measurements of the ascending aorta are comparable to CT aortography but yield larger diameters than TTE, demonstrating its feasibility for evaluating aortic dimensions and stiffness.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for the evaluation of aortic elastic properties. METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the aorta was performed in 12 patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) evidence for enlargement of the ascending aorta - diameter ≥ 40.0 mm. Mechanical properties of the aorta were derived from the measured diameters and intra-aortic pressure. Paired samples T-test analyses were performed to determine differences between measurements derived by TTE, CT and IVUS. RESULTS: Mean values of the calculated elastic properties via IVUS of the ascending aorta were as follows: compliance 0.021 ± 0.02; strain 205 ± 4.3; aortic stiffness index 4.3 ± 0.75; elastic modulus 0.31 ± 0.05. On paired T-test analysis maximum ascending aortic diameter measured by CT aortography and IVUS did not differ significantly (t = -0.19, p = 0.985), but a significant difference between IVUS measurements and TTE derived diameters was found (t = 13.118, p = 0.034). On average, IVUS diameters were 2.3 mm larger than the results acquired by TTE (95% confidence interval: 14.21-17.13). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound examination of the ascending aorta provided larger diameters than the ones collected by means of TTE. However, IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from diameters derived by CT aortography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mileva et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Enlargement of the ascending aorta (n=12). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging vs. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) was evaluated on Maximum ascending aortic diameter (MD 2.3, 95% CI 14.21-17.13, p=0.034). Intravascular ultrasound of the ascending aorta yielded diameters 2.3 mm larger than TTE (95% CI 14.21-17.13; P=0.034), but did not differ significantly from CT aortography (P=0.985).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: