Key result
Radiographic and cross-sectional imaging features, such as main pulmonary artery dilation, can aid in the early and accurate diagnosis of specific pulmonary hypertension etiologies.
Why the study?
Imaging features of pulmonary hypertension may precede clinical diagnosis, and certain radiographic signs can help clinicians identify etiologies that lack distinguishing clinical manifestations.
Awareness of early and late radiographic and cross-sectional imaging features of pulmonary hypertension can aid in early diagnosis and suggest specific etiologies.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a disease characterized by elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure and/or elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, as measured by right heart catheterization.1–4 Individuals often present with dyspnea and decreased functional exertion. Imaging features of PH may be present prior to clinical diagnosis. Certain radiographic signs can be useful in identifying the etiology of the PH.5 We present a variety of imaging features that are aimed at making these etiologies apparent to clinicians, with a focus on those etiologies that do not otherwise usually have distinguishing clinical manifestations.There are a variety of signs that are present in advanced PH regardless of etiology. The most obvious begin with the changes in the main pulmonary artery (PA) itself. On plain radiography, enlargement of the main PA typically obscures the expected concavity between the aortic arch and the main PA silhouette, the so-called “aortopulmonary window” (Figure 1). Additionally, dilated descending left and right PAs can suggest PH (Figures 2 and 3). Right atrial enlargement and right ventricle (RV) enlargement (Figure 2) may also be evident.The main PA diameter (mPAD) should be measured on computed tomography (CT) 1 cm from the bifurcation of the right and left PAs, or at least at the widest portion within 3 cm of the bifurcation6 (Figure 4). An mPAD ≥29 mm has a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 89%, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.97 for PH.6 Another common measurement compares mPAD to aorta diameter, abbreviated here as PA-Ao ratio. A PA-Ao ratio >1 has a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 81% for PH.7 While mPAD dilation can suggest the presence of PH, it does not correlate with PH severity, but rather to the length of time that PH has been present.8In addition to static measurements of the great vessels, Scelsi et al.7 have shown that being able to visualize the main PA at the same level as the most caudal aspect of the aortic arch, the so called “egg-and-banana” sign (Figure 5), is also associated with the presence of PH. Particularly, they noted that its presence had a similar PPV (85%) to the PA-Ao ratio >1 (PPV 87%) and that the combination increased the PPV to 90%.Left ventricle (LV) and RV characteristics can also point to the presence of PH (Figure 6). An RV free wall thickness ≥6 mm on CT has an odds ratio (OR) of 30.5 for PH, and an RV-to-LV luminal diameter ratio of ≥1.28 carries an OR of 28.8.9 Interventricular septal flattening and reflux of contrast material down the inferior vena cava also suggest RV pressure overload10 (Figure 7).While many of the above findings may still be nonspecific to PH, if PH is strongly suspected or confirmed clinically, the following findings might provide strong clues as to the etiology of the PH. There are a few diseases that have very distinct imaging findings and usually have little extrapulmonary clinical manifestations. We have decided to group these findings in order by the proposed World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension clinical group classifications for PH.31112This group is made up of a diverse set of precapillary and postcapillary diseases that lead to pulmonary arterial hypertrophy.Plexogenic pulmonary arteriopathy is the pathognomonic histopathologic lesion of PAH,13 with its presence signifying the ongoing angiogenic pathology of PAH.14 The pulmonary vasculature undergoes a progression of changes from arterial medial hypertrophy to subsequent intimal proliferation and eventually compensatory plexus.15 Tortuous hypertrophic arterioles may be seen peripherally as a result (Figure 8).16 Poorly defined ground glass attenuation centrilobular nodules can be seen on CT (Figure 9), which might represent either the plexogenic lesions or cholesterol deposits.17Partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (PAPVR) is an anomalous venous connection in which some pulmonary venous return drains back to the right atrium, either via direct connection or through an atrial septal defect (ASD; Figure 10), but does not cause total cyanosis as might a total anomalous connection. Left-to-right shunting is present which might eventually lead to PH. PAPVR is overall a rare finding,18 but its presence should prompt search for ASD, especially a sinus venosus type of ASD if the location of PAPVR is in the right upper lobe (Figure 11), as these are highly associated.19Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a postcapillary disease with characteristic findings of interlobular septal thickening, resembling the parenchymal imaging findings of left-sided heart failure without clinical evidence of left-sided congestion (Figure 12). Pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis (PCH) may be on the spectrum with PVOD as one disease.20 PCH tends to present with diffuse, random ground glass attenuation nodules (Figure 13) corresponding to foci of capillary proliferation in the secondary pulmonary lobules. Characteristically, PCH is a postcapillary contributor to PH, as is PVOD. Notably, PCH and PVOD do not respond to pulmonary vasodilators, and there is an increase in risk of pulmonary edema and respiratory failure21 with these advanced vasodilator therapies.Chest radiography can show LV hypertrophy, as well as left atrial and ventricular dilation, all to suggest left-sided cardiomyopathy that is associated with Group 2 disease.The main causes of Group 3 disease are the chronic hypoxemic respiratory diseases such as interstitial lung disease (ILD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.1 The role for chest CT in making a noninvasive diagnosis for this group of diseases, particularly ILD, is well established.22Chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) is an underdiagnosed etiology and is often diagnosed at the same time that an individual presents with manifestations of their PH.23 The diagnosis is increasingly important given advances in treatment.24–26 CTEPH has several characteristic imaging features, including imaging findings of acute and chronic PA thrombi (Figures 14–16), bronchial artery hypertrophy (Figures 17 and 18), and mosaic attenuation (Figures 19–21).Group 5 etiologies represent a variety of diseases for which the mechanism in association with PH is not yet well understood. These include sarcoidosis and hematologic malignancies, among others.Awareness of early and late radiographic and cross-sectional imaging features of PH may be helpful in early and accurate diagnosis. In many conditions that cause PH, imaging alone may suggest a specific etiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carmona et al. (2019) conducted a review in Pulmonary hypertension. Radiographic and cross-sectional imaging was evaluated. Radiographic and cross-sectional imaging features, such as main pulmonary artery dilation, can aid in the early and accurate diagnosis of specific pulmonary hypertension etiologies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: