Key result
The proposed PhysNet spatio-temporal network accurately reconstructed remote photoplethysmography signals from facial videos, achieving a heart rate measurement RMSE of 1.812 bpm and improving atrial fibrillation detection accuracy to 80.22%.
Absolute Event Rate: 1.812% vs 1.906%
Deep spatio-temporal networks can accurately reconstruct rPPG signals from facial videos, enabling non-contact heart rate variability analysis and potential screening for atrial fibrillation.
May enable contactless AF screening; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Recent studies demonstrated that the average heart rate (HR) can be measured from facial videos based on non-contact remote photoplethysmography (rPPG). However for many medical applications (e.g., atrial fibrillation (AF) detection) knowing only the average HR is not sufficient, and measuring precise rPPG signals from face for heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is needed. Here we propose an rPPG measurement method, which is the first work to use deep spatio-temporal networks for reconstructing precise rPPG signals from raw facial videos. With the constraint of trend-consistency with ground truth pulse curves, our method is able to recover rPPG signals with accurate pulse peaks. Comprehensive experiments are conducted on two benchmark datasets, and results demonstrate that our method can achieve superior performance on both HR and HRV levels comparing to the state-of-the-art methods. We also achieve promising results of using reconstructed rPPG signals for AF detection and emotion recognition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2019) studied Healthy and Atrial Fibrillation (n=133). PhysNet (Spatio-temporal network) vs. Traditional rPPG methods (ROI_green, CHROM, POS) was evaluated on Root mean square error (RMSE) of heart rate measurement (bpm). The proposed PhysNet spatio-temporal network accurately reconstructed remote photoplethysmography signals from facial videos, achieving a heart rate measurement RMSE of 1.812 bpm and improving atrial fibrillation detection accuracy to 80.22%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: