Key result
Regular unsupervised walking at a usual pace resulted in only 25.4% of middle-aged adults achieving the ideal training heart rate intensity for positive physiological effects.
Why the study?
Does regular unsupervised walking in middle-aged adults achieve sufficient effort intensity to produce a positive physiological training effect?
Cross-Sectional (n=142)
Does regular unsupervised walking in middle-aged adults achieve sufficient effort intensity to produce a positive physiological training effect?
p-value: p=0.002
Most middle-aged adults engaging in regular unsupervised walking do not reach the target heart rate intensity required for cardiovascular training benefits.
BACKGROUND: Walking is one of the most commonly recommended activities for sedentary individuals. When performed at the correct intensity, it can provide cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, and other benefits by providing a training effect in addition to reducing the risk of death from cardiovascular diseases and other chronic health conditions. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to assess whether individuals who practiced regular unsupervised walking carry out the activity safely and with sufficient effort intensity parameters to have a positive physiological (training) effect. The secondary objective was to compare the training heart rate (HR) and the stability of the HR within the ideal range of training between the sexes. METHOD: Individuals were selected from walking tracks within the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The study included subjects from 40 to 60 years of age who had practiced walking for at least two months prior to the study, walking at least three times a week. Individuals who agreed to participate in the survey were asked to walk 15 minutes at their usual pace with their HR measured every 5 minutes using a heart rate monitor. Their average walking HR was compared to the average training HR based on the formula: (220 - age) × 70 to 80% that would result in a positive physiological training effect. RESULTS: Of the 142 individuals evaluated, 25.4% achieved the average training HR. This result was significantly lower than those who did not achieve the average training HR while walking (p=0.002). There were significant differences between men and women who had reached the training HR (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: The authors found that individuals who walk regularly performed outside the range of the ideal HR intensity that would cause a positive physiological effect and therefore would probably not achieve a beneficial training effect while walking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Adults practicing regular walking (n=142). Regular unsupervised walking at usual pace vs. Physiological training HR threshold (70-80% of max HR) was evaluated on Achieving the average training heart rate (70 to 80% of maximum HR) (p=0.002). Regular unsupervised walking at a usual pace resulted in only 25.4% of middle-aged adults achieving the ideal training heart rate intensity for positive physiological effects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: