Key result
Contact-force guided catheter ablation did not reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to non-contact-force ablation in patients with severe left atrial enlargement (58% vs 50%).
Why the study?
Does contact-force guided catheter ablation improve the success rate of pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation patients with severe left atrial enlargement?
Cohort (n=66)
No
Does contact-force guided catheter ablation improve the success rate of pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation patients with severe left atrial enlargement?
Contact-force guided ablation does not significantly improve the 12-month success rate of pulmonary vein isolation in patients with longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation and severe left atrial enlargement compared to non-contact-force ablation.
Contact-force ablation offers no recurrence benefit in severe LA enlargement; leaves open need for targeted RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is a cornerstone treatment strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF). Left atrial (LA) size is one of the contributors in development of AF recurrences. The impact of contact-forced (CF) guided catheter ablation on the success rate of persistent AF patients with severe enlarged LA has not been investigated yet. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with diagnosis of longstanding persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation were enrolled. All patients underwent a standard transthoracic echocardiography according to the guidelines. LA size was considered severely enlarged when LA diameter was ≥ 50 mm. CF catheter ablation with a Tacticath Quartz catheter (St Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) was used in all patients. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.9 ± 9.9 years, and LAD 47.8 ± 11.6 mm. Among 66 patients with persistent AF, 32 (48%) patients were diagnosed with AF recurrences. Twenty-eight (42%) patients had severely enlarged LA. The recurrence of AF was comparable in patients with and without severe enlarged LA (47% vs. 42%, p=0.79). The recurrence of AF was lower in patients who underwent CF-guided ablation with a normal LA dimension (36 %, p=0.54). Procedure duration was longer in patients with severely enlarged LA. LA dimension was not significantly different between patients with and without AF recurrence (49.8 ± 7.9 mm vs. 45.9 ± 7.5 mm, p=0.15). LAD and was significantly correlated with the time to recurrence of AF (r:-0.60, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary findings have demonstrated that CF guided ablation does not improve the success rate in longstanding persistent AF patients with severe LA enlargement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enes Elvin Gül (2018) conducted a cohort in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=66). Contact-Force (CF) guided catheter ablation vs. Non-CF guided catheter ablation was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence at 12 months in patients with severe LA enlargement (p=0.54). Contact-force guided catheter ablation did not reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to non-contact-force ablation in patients with severe left atrial enlargement (58% vs 50%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: