Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Existing life-history concepts deal inadequately with clonal organisms. To make them more generally applicable, several assumptions must be widened: (i) life histories may be expressed at different levels of individual organization. e. g. genets and modules; (ii) parts of a life cycle may be executed more than once by a single genetic individual; (iii) genetic individuals do not necessarily senesce; (iv) size and reproductive value of genetic individuals may increase indefinitely with age; and (v) dormancy, dispersal of progeny, and production of genetically different progeny are not necessarily linked to the same process, as they are in reproduction of unitary organisms. A model is presented of a size-structured population of genets, in which each genet comprises an age-structured metapopulation of modules. The model predicts that the extent to which clonal growth evolves depends on: constraints in genet architecture (high or low within-genet ‘dispersal’); cost of reproduction relative to that of clonal growth; the presence or absence of density-dependent regulation of population size; the presence of lethal events that kill entire genets, as opposed to genet mortality occurring only as a consequence of the mortality of all its modules; the ability of genets to predict such lethal events; and the temporal heterogeneity of the environment. The predicted responses to r- and K -selection differ markedly from those predicted for unitary organisms, especially for genets with high within-genet dispersal. For example, r-selection may favour clonal growth with no reproduction, whereas K -selection favours greater reproduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamilton et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: