Key result
A longer heart rate-corrected QT interval was associated with an increased risk of death within one year after percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01-1.12; p=0.022).
Why the study?
Do specific electrocardiographic parameters predict 1-year mortality in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Case-Control (n=3,342)
Do specific electrocardiographic parameters predict 1-year mortality in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Odds Ratio: 1.07 (95% CI 1.01–1.12)
p-value: p=0.022
A longer heart rate-corrected QT interval is an independent predictor of 1-year mortality in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.
Background: The outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) varies considerably. Several ECG parameters have recently emerged (PQ interval, P-wave, T-peak-to-T-end interval, T-wave, T/R ratio, J-wave) beyond traditional markers (rhythm, QRS, Q-wave, QT interval, ST segment) and were attributed important prognostic value in the setting of coronary artery disease. The present study integrated for the first time these ECG parameters altogether with the aim to determine their role in predicting patients’ outcome after a PCI.Methods: A total of 3342 patients were enrolled in the present study between 2009 and 2013. In a nested case–control design, 644 patients who died within a year post-PCI (cases) were matched 1:4 with patients alive at that particular date (controls).Results: Our data showed that only the presence of a longer QT interval (heart rate-corrected using Bazett formula) was associated with increased risk of death after adjusting for multiple clinical and angiographic risk factors (adjusted OR 1.07; 95%CI 1.01–1.12, p = .022).Conclusion: Our study emphasises the prognostic importance of the QT interval in identifying patients at increased risk of death during the first year after PCI.Clinical Trial Registration – URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02241291.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2018) conducted a case-control in percutaneous coronary interventions (n=3,342). Longer QT interval was evaluated on death within a year post-PCI (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.12, p=0.022). A longer heart rate-corrected QT interval was associated with an increased risk of death within one year after percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01-1.12; p=0.022).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: