Direct intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring provides a continuous and direct alternative to cuff measurements in cardiovascular crises.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform monitoring choices during cardiovascular crises; leaves open need for prospective trials to guide adoption.
firmer to the surgeon's fingers. But how strong are the beats? The anesthesiologist scans a manometer dial for the oscillations coming from the blood pressure cuff that might give the answer. But is the pressure really good enough to assure that the patient is getting the circulation he requires? Another patient has suffered a ruptured viscus and the toxins in his blood are threatening the vascular bed. His nurse must administer intravenous vasopressors at a rate adequate to maintain a systolic pressure over 80 mm. Hg. She wraps a cuff around the brachial artery and listens carefully for the Korotkoff sounds. How faint they are. Did she hear them correctly? Does the cuff measurement represent the central arterial pressure, or is she being misled by the peripheral vasodilatation or vasoconstriction that may accompany sepsis? Uncertainty in cardiovascular crises like these is common enough to warrant employing an alternative technique to evaluate blood pressure-a technique that is continuous and direct. By passing a catheter into the artery and attaching it to an electronic measuring system, one can measure arterial pressure as it is transmitted directly to an electronic pressure sensor called a transducer. The transducer converts the me-
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mary A. Nielsen (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: