Key result
The developed wearable IoT pulse oximeter demonstrated high accuracy, with an average measurement difference of ± 2.8 BPM for heart rate and ± 1.5% for oxygen saturation compared to a standard clinical monitor.
Effect estimate: ± 2.8 BPM (heart rate), ± 1.5% (SpO2)
A newly developed low-cost, wearable IoT pulse oximeter demonstrated high accuracy comparable to standard medical devices, enabling real-time remote monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Promising accuracy supports wearable IoT oximeter development; leaves open prospective clinical validation before adoption.
Adiputra et al. (2018) studied this question. Wearable IoT SpO2 and heart rate device vs. Mindray patient monitor was evaluated on Measurement error rate for heart rate and SpO2 (± 2.8 BPM (heart rate), ± 1.5% (SpO2)). The developed wearable IoT pulse oximeter demonstrated high accuracy, with an average measurement difference of ± 2.8 BPM for heart rate and ± 1.5% for oxygen saturation compared to a standard clinical monitor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: